Main Content
UW Tacoma Grad, Author and Finance Expert Dan Wickens responds to your Money Matters questions
Hey Mayra, thanks for the question!
A refinance can be a great option for some situations, but not for all. When considering a refinance the two most important factors are: time until breakeven, and the minimum time you expect to live in the home.
By time until breakeven, I mean the time that it takes for the savings from refinancing to equal the cost of the refinance. If a refi costs $3,600 and lowers your payment $300/month, it would start saving you money after 12 months / 1 year. If it costs $6,000 and lowers your payment $100/month, you’d break even after 60 months / 5 years. Have the lender calculate breakeven for you and make sure you understand the math.
Once you know the breakeven timeline, you can compare that to what you think is realistic for your time in the home, and remember that major life events can change things in a hurry. If you think you’re in your “forever home” or would use it as a rental if you ever moved again, then you’d be more likely to experience a longer period of benefit from a refinance. However, if it would take 5 years to break even and you aren’t certain you’re staying that long, a refi may end up costing you more than you save.
Some other factors to consider:
Are interest rates at their lowest, or are they expected to fall even more? In the early 2020’s, it was a very obvious time for lots of people to refinance, because rates were historically low and approaching 0%. Right now in March 2025, it’s anyone’s guess what will happen with rates, so its hard to say how interest rate environment should affect your plan.
There could be opportunity cost for the money spent on a refinance as well. For example, if the cash used for the refinance would save you $50,000 over the life of the loan, how would that compare to investing the refinance cost (say, in a Roth IRA) for the life of the loan?
You may be given the option to pay the refinance cost up front, or add it to the new loan balance. Remember that if you add to the loan, it will bear compounding interest for the life of the loan.
Closing and opening accounts dings your credit score a little, but likely nothing too prohibitive.
Thanks again for the question, and hope that helps!
I am looking to purchase a vehicle. There's an alternative method to finance through a savings-secured loan (Pledge Loan) through Navy Federal. Can you explain the pros/cons of this option and if its worth considering given the high auto interest rates.
_______________________________________________________
Thanks, Kelsy! This is an excellent question.
I looked up the savings-secured loan through Navy Federal, and if I found the right product, I can see why you’re intrigued (link and snip below to confirm). I haven't previously done much research on this specific type of product, so it was fun to learn and think it through.
Quick disclaimer: my reply does not represent professional financial advice, and we are not engaged in a service agreement of any kind. Simply put, I’m here as a friend 😊
Savings-secured loan vs. traditional auto loan
Without more specific details of the product, based on Navy Federal's site I generally expect the pledge loan would be both cheaper and more flexible for you compared to a traditional auto loan. Some folks even use pledge loans as a preferred credit building tool. For example, I read about people taking a pledge loan, immediately paying most of it back, and adjusting their installment payment amount to pay tiny amounts for the rest of the term. While any loan will likely decrease credit scores initially (the inquiry and the increase in total debt amount are both negatives) the users mitigated this by paying back most of the debt immediately and then expanded their positive credit history by paying their installment loan timely. That may not be an option with all products, but sharing in case it's helpful to consider.
I think the risks are likely similar between savings-secured and a traditional auto loan, since both are collateralized (pledge loan secured by your cash, auto loan secured by your car). As a conceptual note, I think the reason they can offer a lower rate for a pledge loan is because the cash collateral is better compared to a vehicle, which depreciates with time and usage. However, it would be good to make sure you understand what would happen in the event of missed payment or default, and if there are any penalties for early repayment if you decide to do so. Then you can compare that to what you know about traditional auto loans.
As long as there's nothing too sinister in the savings-secured loan fine print, it seems like a valid alternative to a traditional auto loan and may be cheaper and/or more flexible.
Savings-secured loan vs. cash
It sounds like you already have cash that you'd be using to secure/collateralize the loan, so that leads to the question – why not just use the cash for your purchase? Why pay interest if you don’t have to? Really, that comes down to personal preference and opportunity costs. Full transparency - I've never used a pledge loan, so I don't want to assume I know every nuance, but I think I understand it enough to form a general opinion.
For any given person, I suspect the material opportunity costs of using your existing cash to pay for the vehicle up front instead of using it to secure a loan are:
- Lost flexibility. You'd save on the interest costs of the loan, but your cash would be gone-gone. However, make sure you understand when/how your cash would become available to you again as the pledge loan is repaid. Some folks may decide that the cost of the interest is worth the flexibility, compared to the finality of sending all the cash out the door at once. This comes down to personal preference, as well as reasonably projecting other life/cash needs over the term of the loan. Again though - most important is to understand when/how cash becomes available under the savings-secured loan, so that you can reasonably compare your liquidity.
- Lost credit-building opportunity. Using a loan of some kind provides credit-building if needed/desired; however, depending on severity of the need or desire to build installment credit, this may not be worthwhile.
Hope that helps, and thanks again!
P.S. this is the product I found and was reviewing.
Thanks!
- Crowdfunding
- Person to person loan (i.e. borrow from an individual)
- Bringing in a partner who can finance
Defense first
First, make sure you have no credit card debt or other high interest debt. If you currently carry high interest debt, the best thing for your financial position is likely to put the funds toward paying those down. If high interest debt isn’t a concern, the next step is to check your emergency savings – do you have a minimum of 1 month of living expenses saved, or more preferably, at least 3 months worth? The reason this is also a priority prior to investing is because if disaster strikes – car trouble, medical bills, income loss – having the emergency savings serves as defense against toxic credit card debt, which often charges 24% or more in interest. Don’t count on any investment performing better than that consistently. And, even if invested funds are in a highly accessible account, you risk having to withdraw them in a market downturn. If you decide to save some or all of your bonus in an emergency savings, it would look pretty in a high yield money market account, earning decent interest without compromising access to funds.
Ok, now that I’ve nagged about proven defensive strategies, let’s look at the fun stuff.
Now build your lead!
You’ve made some money, you’ve set up your defense against disaster, and now you’re ready to go build on what you’ve started. Assuming you’re hoping to invest for long-term purposes (i.e. retirement) my preference is to use a tax-advantaged account and index funds. If you are eligible (and most people are), putting your money in a Roth IRA could be a great choice. I personally prefer this over a brokerage, since it will grow tax free forever while remaining reasonably accessible. If you stuck your bonus into a Roth IRA and earned 8% for 40 years, it would grow tax-free to over 24x its original value. If it earned 10% for the same period, it would be worth nearly 54x. Woohoo!
With long-term investing in a Roth IRA, I prefer to focus on proven equity index funds rather than trying to hit it big with more speculative investing. If you invest early and often enough, you don’t need to hit the jackpot. A lot of folks like choosing a combination of large cap, mid cap, small cap, and international index funds. Or, some just go with large cap, such as a fund built to track the S&P 500.
Here are some links to a reputable site that describes more about index funds and Roth IRAs.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/indexfund.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/roth-ira-4771236
Wrapping up
I’m happy to hear you’re getting a bonus! Well-earned I’m sure. I hope that whatever you decide to do, it feels like a win. And if you carve out some of your funds to treat yourself to something fun, I think that’s great too. Thanks again for the question, and good luck!
Hope that helps! Thanks again for the great question.
Hey Jack, thanks for this question!
It’s a really fun and interesting exercise. Honestly, what you said about dollar cost averaging into an index fund is pretty good, especially when you think things are overpriced. It’s not a perfect metric, but one I like to check when I’m skeptical of market highs is the price-earnings ratio of the S&P 500. At the time of writing, the prices compared to the earnings are higher than typical, which is extra interesting consider interest rates aren’t exceedingly low. This supports your concern that you might be “buying high” if you were to transition all the funds from cash savings into equities all at once. Now, on to your question.
If it were me with that $1,000,000 in high yield savings (hopefully spread out to not exceed any FDIC insurance coverage limits), I’d be looking for the best combination of opportunities among several options:
- Frequent conversions to index funds (dollar-cost averaging) and making biggest conversions if/when market prices swing lower
- Investment property
- Vacation property with rental potential
- Leave it in high yield savings
- Fun and fulfillment
None of these ideas are perfect or free of risk, and all have opportunity cost as well. But here are some interesting examples:
- Your original example of investing index funds over the course of time, with an added note to convert extra when markets are in a downturn. For example, if the S&P 500 loses 20% and you think it’s near the bottom, that may be an awesome time to scoop up a ton of shares at a lower price.
- Buy rental property for $500,000 cash, invest the rest in index funds over the course of time (buying extra when markets are in a downturn)
- Buy two rental properties for $500,000 each
- Buy a vacation property in cash, and allow weekly rentals when not in use to provide extra cash flow. Not for everyone, but if you think you could handle occasional visitors, could be cool! I’m no expert in this, but I’d guess weekly or even monthly rental minimums could help avoid more destructive crowds. Any leftover funds could stay in high yield savings, or maybe some conversions to index funds.
- You could always just leave the funds in the high yield savings and enjoy the $40,000-ish per year. You could stick to your career and choose a role that let’s you feel healthy and fulfilled, invest as you would if the nest egg wasn’t there, and use high yield savings interest for trips around the world, charity, or anything else you feel like doing.
Some clarifying thoughts on the investment properties… it’s incredibly hard to assess if real estate is overpriced at the moment, and I don’t have a great benchmark or metric to help with that. The reason I chose $500,000 for the home prices is that this appears to be a round median price for 3-bedroom homes in Tacoma/Pierce County. Based on similar research, you could probably rent that home for $2,650/month, but you’d also be on the hook for repairs, maintenance, insurance and property taxes. Rents could be raised occasionally over time, or sometimes quite a bit, and the property should appreciate in value over time if well maintained. That said, being a landlord comes with lots of potential risk and cost, and interestingly enough, Tacoma has legislation that impacts the ability for property owners to collect from renters.
Hope that helps, and thanks for the fun exercise!







